18 April, 2020
Let’s just put this out there: If you’re looking for a great app that works offline, The New York Times app is the best choice.
We’ve tested the product in offline and online mode and want to summarize WHY the app gives you one of the best offline experiences in the following:
It stands out that the New York Times doesn’t force the user to take advantage of the offline usable function. You don’t want to occupy your internal storage or you don’t have enough data left? No problem, just switch offline functionality off.
The offline section allows you to manage how the app should work offline. By managing this, you decide what content is available offline for you. Having all content offline is possible.
The user experience during online and offline connectivity is nearly the same. The app allows normal browsing through the news feed.
If you are offline for a longer time, articles or the latest news might have changed or gotten updated. During your time offline, it’s not possible to download the latest changes. The app clearly indicates when the content was last updated.
The app clearly informs us when features like commenting are not available.
Here’s some technical information, these are the SDKs used by the New York Times app:
While most companies do not have an “offline strategy”, the New York Times has leveraged this opportunity to provide immense value to the subscriber, giving them control over when they engage with the app, irrespective of its connectivity.
But if you don’t have a subscription, the advantages of the offline app usage are not available for you.
When I see an article I want to comment on, I want to do it immediately before I forget what I wanted to say or write.
If an image is not downloaded, it constantly shows “loading” when clicking on it. Here it would be better to inform the user that there is no internet connection and that the picture is not available offline.
By letting the users wait, even though you know that it won’t work, you frustrate the user. The analytics solution UXCam, unlike most other tools, supports offline analytics and allows you to see how users use the app offline along with capturing what they do.
UXCam analyzes offline sessions to help you identify user frustration.
The New York Times app has a clear offline app strategy allowing customers to use the app even when they are offline. This is something most companies have as an afterthought.
Not being usable offline might be okay at the very beginning of an app’s life, but it is a poor decision not to think about an offline app strategy as soon as possible. Not being usable online means lost revenue and a significant negative impact on your brand. Especially when you want to reach an international market that includes developing countries, an offline strategy is important to deliver a good user experience.
The user experience of the New York Times app offline and online is consistent, but there is some space for improvement. Particularly a placeholder when images are not downloaded and the ability to write comments in offline mode (and publish them when being online again) would be great.
To analyze user behavior, the New York Times uses tools like Localytics, which are similar to UXCam. To get a full picture of what your users do, it is important to use tools that are able to record offline by efficiently caching offline data. It should have been recorded when it happened, not when the data was received. Solutions like UXCam support this and further functionalities.
Passionate hobby dancer. Working at UXCam.
Stay up-to-date with UXCam's latest features, insights, and industry news for an exceptional user experience.
Ensure your product's success with MVP testing. Learn what it is, how to validate your MVP, and best practices for gathering user...
Learn to create user-centric apps with this comprehensive guide on user personas. Understand your target audience, enhance user experience, and drive app...